After his death, I kept being asked questions about Charlie Kirk. I hadn’t ever said much about Kirk while he was alive. I spoke on a few podcasts in the months running up to his death, and I said that Charlie Kirk played the same sort of role as Ben Shapiro had before him. He was paid to beat children in debates. Kirk used logic sometimes, and he’d knowingly wielded logical fallacies on occasions. If anyone were winning an argument, then he’d use his religion as an answer, a tactic which is only counted as a victory by the Christian right and is considered a cop out by everyone else.
It wasn’t a surprise to see Kirk lionised after his assassination—and for the sake of argument, I’m going to assume he was assassinated—but it was also not a surprise to see violence be used instead of debate. We are in the era of Fifth Generation Warfare; characters such as Charlie Kirk are boosted because they emote the opposition. If you keep poking a bear, then there will be blood. The current age of the algorithmic psyops is all about bear poking.
If you wield verbal weaponry well, then you will be thrust into the fray without delay. The Fifth Generation Infantry Brigade are not dressed in green, wearing helmets and carrying rifles into battle. The new era of warfare brings the perpetual Hegelian two-step. One minute you are part of the thesis, and a slight political moment later, you’re part of a new antithesis; the modern narratives synthesise at hyper-speed. The rank and file of the Fifth Generation Infantry Brigade is made up of flip-flopping influencers, whose narrative is changed with a quick bit of crypto, a swish marketing campaign, or by a trending breeze.
As soon as Kirk keeled over, the information warfare began. Alex Jones began his ridiculous deep-state ranting. Boosted influencers started pointing out both the fact that Kirk had supported Israel and criticised Israel, each using whichever of Charlie Kirk’s media-savvy flip-flops that suits them best. Some pointed up and some pointed down. There was no evidence; Kirk’s body was not even cold, and every camera angle, every movement, every flick of the hat or furrowed brow became conclusive proof of whatever the eye of the beholder wanted it to prove. This is a facet of the era of Fifth Generation Warfare. A thousand camera angles lead to confusion and speculation rather than context or conclusion.
There is nothing conclusive permitted for broadcast within this new paradigm. They don’t allow people to see my reporting on Elon Musk training via various Epstein-funded elite training programs. Instead, they replace the facts with a thousand influencers who say “Elon Musk is on the Epstein list”. It all drives the need for speculation, and speculation can be dismissed. Thousands of accounts post the same bland sentence to fuel the distraction. Every one of them avoids posting any information which, if they were interested in the Epstein case, would be big news. This is the Mockingbird Social Media, the new MSM. Their intentions are rendered transparent by the uniform manner of their purposeful ignorance. I’ve been investigating the way influencers are being paid and managed for quite some time. In fact, I’ve been approached on occasion.
Firstly, those who are manufacturing the Mockingbird Social Media contact you with an offer that seems innocuous. They want an opinion, and often provide their preferred Establishment narrative. For folks like me, that usually ends the affair quickly. However, if they perceive you as important enough, or a big enough account, they’ll accept that you’re not going to cooperate straight away, and the next step will be to offer you more money with tighter restrictions. The average person is programmed to form habits. They become accustomed to receiving money, and they start to expect it to continue. They soon become willing to bend their personal ethics and express the values they’re paid to express.
I had always wondered how they managed to convince so many accounts to post out identical anti-woke propaganda. I am predisposed to reject woke culture, so it should be easy to convince someone like me to post anti-woke propaganda regularly in return for money. I was asked to post around 7 anti-woke posts a week, 28 a month, in return for $250 per month. Of course, I refused their offer of “growing together” by flooding my feed with meaningless and divisive rhetoric, which is ten a penny nowadays, and it’s only ten a penny because they pay so many to do just that. They are paying thousands of people to make as much noise as possible, and all that noise is to distract. It’s the sound of the Mockingbird Social Media flocking to wherever the money is.
It’s hard to make money through content creation, so, as a creator, when people do support your work, you’re obviously going to be grateful. As food prices rise and the cost of living crushes personal economies, people’s ethical standards are lowered. For someone who opposes the very essence of woke culture, receiving payment for saying what they believe would normally be a no-brainer. But the questions those people should ask include: why were they originally so activated about the subject they’re posting? Why do they care so much? Do they really care so much that they’d saturate their public image with divisive rhetoric which targets more than just those deserving of such rhetoric? And are they only posting such content because they believe there is a massive organic movement on their side?
The other pertinent question we should all ask is: are any organic movements nowadays, or are all organic movements co-opted and re-manufactured as soon as they’re recognised as trending by the algorithms?
When I look at the response to the Charlie Kirk assassination or the inorganic Epstein list crescendo on X, I see the Fifth Generation Warfare DOGE department coordinating a mass of psyops. As one of the leading Epstein researchers in the world, I can tell you more than just the names on the lists. I can reveal details of their connections, I can show you the history, the backstory, the context, and I can prove what I say by supplying sources and evidence. If any of those people claiming to want the release of the so-called “Epstein Files” truly wanted more information, then they would share the work of the journalists who have been reporting on the details of the case since at least 2019. In reality, these Mockingbirds of Social Media don’t want to publish details because it doesn’t make them any money. The removal of detail and context is the most valuable commodity for them.
This is a key tactic of the biggest PR firms in the world, Edelman PR. I reported on Edelman PR a few years ago on behalf of UnlimitedHangout in an article entitled, Edelman PR and the Manufacturing of Trust. Their representative, Matthew Harrington, took part in the infamous pre-pandemic Event 201. In that meeting, Harrington stated:
“I think we’re at a moment where the social media platforms need to step forward and recognize that the moment to assert that they’re a technology platform and not a broadcaster is over. They in fact have to be a participant in broadcasting accurate information and partnering with the scientific and health communities to counterweight, if not flood the zone, of accurate information. Because to put the genie back in the bottle of disinformation or misinformation is nigh on impossible.”
This is what we’re observing on all social media platforms: they are flooding the zone. The influencers who post near-identical tweets are using a marketing tactic adopted regularly by the most unethical PR companies in the world. They do this so that the real information, the real context, the real details are all lost within the flood.
When Charlie Kirk was supposedly shot publicly, the screaming left blamed the maniacal right and vice versa. The orders came in from those who pay influencers, and every side started producing a range of almost identical narratives to flood the zone.
There is no point for me to ponder over the assassination of Charlie Kirk; I don’t have enough details to know what happened conclusively. Instead, all I have are thousands of accounts that are busy flooding the zone with meaningless speculation. If I were to be washed away by the proverbial flood, then I would be given my heroes and given my villains. I’m not interested in mourning over someone else’s hero.
After Kirk’s assassination, the usual PR campaigns started. They were intent on flooding the zone with comments which aimed to lionise Kirk. If you believe that this was all organic, then you’re easily fooled. You need to see that the synchronised responses of influencers represent a paid marketing campaign, and not public sentiment.
This is what psychological warfare looks like, and, instead of indulging in nonsense shared by the paid influencers on the new MSM, the Mockingbird Social Media, we should go to independent websites and platforms which actually supply sources and evidence for their claims. You have to refuse to be spoon-fed information and be willing to do some digging yourself.
When the Mockingbird Social Media floods the zone with fake news, the truth is the only thing which drowns.
NEWSPASTE 